Pages

Showing posts with label Foraging. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Foraging. Show all posts

Saturday, September 3, 2011

In a Mad, Mad World, Only the Mad are Sane: Reflections on Mad Food Camp


Rene Redzepi of Noma

This past weekend, I was fortunate enough to attend MAD[1] Food Camp in Copenhagen, Denmark. Organized by NOMA’s René Redzepi, the highlight of the weekend festival was a symposium, Planting Thoughts. This was both in the literal and metaphorical sense. There was plenty talk of plant biology, environmentalism, cooking techniques, terroir and everything in between. Scientists, chefs, pundits, policy makes were all abuzz. And there were foodie rock stars. Michel Bras, Harold McGee, Ben Shewry, Andoni Aduriz, Massimo Bottura (in spirit), Hans Heren, David Chang, Gaston Acurio…the list goes on and on. But for me, the most important discussion was about ecology in its literal form: the study of our house(s).[2]
            For those of you who don’t remember your Ancient Greek, a philology lesson is in place. For the Ancient Greeks, oikos, or the house, was not merely four walls and a roof. The oikos was your physical house, your family, your farm, your animals and your slaves (this is Ancient Greece after all). In other words, a household. But in the logos, or study, of the household, it is not merely the material goods that held this concept in place. It was the relationships between the constituent members of the household that made the oikos the center of Ancient Greek life.  And for us on this earth, the oikos is our earth, our environment and the living creatures that we live with. These are our houses.
Me and Harold McGee!
            And my, what houses we live with! Starting at one end was Harold McGee at the smallest level: the molecular. In his discussion of flavors, he examined the chemical defenses that plants use to keep predators away. It also happens to be that those defenses are pretty tasty.[3]
David Chang doing some serious thinking (Photo courtesy of Katie Parla)
            David Chang was also at the small end of life, but had a big message. Science matters. In his discussion of the role and importance of microbiology in food, David Chang dropped the gauntlet: “We cooks are allergic to learning science.” For Chang, microbiology was a revelation in his kitchen and not just for kimchee. “It’s our jobs as chefs to learn more. We have to learn more.” 
            And then there were the insect people. Both Alex Atala of DOM in Brazil and Jacqueline McGlade of the European Environmental Agency dealt with the little critters in our lives, but with very different perspectives. McGlade discussed bees and urban beekeeping for the socially disadvantaged in Copenhagen and across Europe. For Atala, it was how insects become a gateway for thinking about our palates and our own selves: “To us, ants taste like lemongrass. To the Amazonians, lemongrass tastes like ants.” To prove a point, he passed out Amazonian ants encased in agar.[4] Taste is controlled by nature, not the other way around. 
Ant in agar.
            This was also the message that foraging expert Francois Couplan and master forager Miles Irving had for the symposium. Nature is all around us and food is all around us if we only know where to look. Irving gave a virtual tour of the English woods and meadows, complete with seeds and plants. As he lovingly put it: “There is treasure in the woods and the fields.” Couplan, an ethnobotanist, pointed to the vast diversity of wild edible plants and seeds across the world. Wild carrots, nettles, clover were right under our noses at MAD Food Camp. “Why do you people not know that?” Good question.
            Speaking of wild things, Tor Nørretranders questioned our understanding of wild and tame in terms of the domestication of plants. Domestication and monoculture has not been good for us – or the earth. In our need to constantly control the means of agricultural production, we have killed our palates and our environment: “Sixty-percent of human calories come from four fucking crops: corn, wheat, potatoes and rice.”
Tor Nørretranders (Photo courtesy of Katie Parla)
            What are the consequences of that sixty (fucking) percent? Dr. Hans Heren, President of the Millennium Institute, gave the sad details and a warning call. In a world where 1 billion eat too much and 1 billion eat too little, how we deal with food inequality makes all the difference in terms of future of world stability. The solution? “The solution is not to grow more food, but how to do different.” According to Heren, a 0.2% GDP investment in the green economy means “…we could produce more food, using less resources.” This means not only organic, which, according to studies done by the Millennium Institute, outperforms conventional in normal years[5], but also investment in alternative crops.
            What are those crops and how are we to grow them? Thomas Harttung, while operating a large organic farm in Jutland, Denmark, sees urban farming and organic farming as the wave of the future. Echoing Heren’s sentiments, Harttung bemoaned the low productivity of conventional farming methods. Despite the intensive use of fertilizers, fuels and land, OECD countries are third in food productivity per hectare. This begs the question of how Magnus Nilsson chef at the famed Fäviken restaurant in Sweden can grow organic produce for an entire year in the span of a 3-month growing season.[6] Answer? Advanced growing techniques, composting and a little help from the University of Stockholm’s agriculture department. The key for Nilsson was not the use of extra nitrates or other land-intensive methods. It was careful planning as well as preservation and storage. And while the methods of farming might have a new twist, the methods of food preservation are not.
Several of the chefs looked at the agricultural and culinary past as means for preserving not only local food traditions, but also ways of life. Andoni Aduriz of Mugaritz[7] in Spain while known for his culinary poesie demonstrated that the magic is not an act of genius. It is the product of people preserving a way of life, whether it is the sea, land or pasture. At the other antipode, Gaston Acurio does the same in his native Peru. Food is a manifestation of the past as much as it is a motivator for the present. As he put it, “Behind the plate, there is the possibility to change someone’s life.”
Yoshihiro Narisawa’
            And sometimes we must accept change thrust upon us. Yoshihiro Narisawa’s haunting Haiku-esque description of Japan after the 2011 earthquake was a reminder of how nature is constantly destroying and renewing itself. The seas have new plankton forms due to the shifting of currents, post-earthquake. The fish must react to those changes. The chef must as well. It is the great circle of life. 
           
We have been bad housekeepers.  Climate change, natural disasters, urbanization, development, industrialization are just few of the challenges to our environment. And we caused most of them.  
            But we can change that. Planting Thoughts was about using the power of food to change food systems and the planet for good. Housekeeping was never easy – not in the Ancient Greek world nor in ours. Nature keeps its own house. It’s up to us to keep our own.


[1] “Mad” means food in Danish.
[2] This is coming from the Ancient Greek: οκος, "house" and  -λογία, "study of." Ecology is the study of our homes, earth, and our relationship to it. (And for extra credit, it is also the same root that defines economics.)
[3] Cooking tip: Do not pound the crap out of your herbs. It only increases the volatility of the oils in herbs, thus overwhelming your dish. Gently rolling or massaging them is the way to go.
[4] How did the ant taste? Well I was lucky. I got 2 agar ants (my friend didn’t want to eat hers). They were crunchy and slightly gingery, with a numbing bite. And they were big. You could see the legs and everything else. There was no doubt about it – it was an ant.
[5] I’m assuming that Heren means that “normal years” as in years in which weather cycles are average. I wouldn’t call this year “average” by any sense of the word. Both drought and flooding have made a huge difference in crop expectations in the US. And the sad part is, especially with the advent of climate change, weird is going to be the new normal.
[6] Fäviken lies in Jarpen, Sweden. It’s up there. Waaaay up there. It’s about 1000 miles south of the Arctic Circle. Just in case that doesn’t do you for scale, it’s a full day (or night) train trip from Stockholm.
[7] Aduriz is considered to be the possible inheritor of El Bulli’s kitchen. If you haven’t heard of him now, trust me, you will.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, June 23, 2011

The Circle of Life


Freshly foraged chanterelles
“Christianity has a built-in defense system: anything that questions a belief, no matter how logical the argument is, is the work of Satan by the very fact that it makes you question a belief. It's a very interesting defense mechanism and the only way to get by it -- and believe me, I was raised Southern Baptist -- is to take massive amounts of mushrooms, sit in a field, and just go, 'Show me.'”
Bill Hicks, American Comedian 1961-1994

When I was kid, I would regularly freak out my mother by telling her I wouldn’t have kids – I would just bud. There would be a Mini-Me branching out from one of my appendages and that would be that. No crazy pickle-ice cream binges, no swollen feet, no epidural. And the best part – I wouldn’t need a man. It seemed like the next step in the human evolutionary scale.
            Unfortunately, due to the college biology classes I was forced to endure as a 13-year old (I have an Asian mom), I learned that this was just not going to be biologically possible. And after I met my husband, I decided that sexually reproducing might be a good thing. But after the birth of my daughter, I was really wishing that budding was a reproduction mechanism for humans. It would saved a lot of cursing at the hospital.
            As many of you cooks know, yeasts are fungi. So are the little blue veins in blue cheese. And any penicillin. But for the foraging cook, the fungi you want are mushrooms. As long as there is the circle of life, there will be ‘shrooms.
            While many think that mushrooms are plants, they are not. They have their own kingdom (like plants, animals and protista)[1]. And unlike bacteria, with which they are often confused for, fungi are eukaryotes.[2]  And one more nerd classification point – mushrooms are NOT plants. They share some of the aspects of plants, such as vacuoles and reproduction mechanisms (spores), and food and water systems, such as rhizomorphs (as in rhizomes, such as ginger). But unlike plants that can fix carbon into organic compounds (via photosynthesis) needed for living (carbohydrates, energy, etc.), mushrooms must have their carbon pre-transformed into organic substances.[3]  In other words, mushrooms can’t make their own food (just like us humans).
            This particular fact, the need for pre-fixed carbon is the reason why mushrooms are around dead plants. They are the ur-composters of the living world, secreting enzymes that “digest” matter around them (just like animals do), and extracting nutrients from both living and dead substances. And they can break down substances that many other living things can’t – such as woody material. They also depend upon bacteria and other decomposers (worms, for example) to break down their carbon sources.
            But the one place you will not see mushrooms is in a desert. Mushrooms need damp conditions and certain nutrients to grow, fruit (this is why a dry summer will produce very few mushrooms in the fall) and reproduce. But unlike seeds that have a food source stored within it’s own structure, spores don’t. Thus it must depend upon its immediate environment to grow. Spores will not develop the hyphae and mycelium (the thread-like network of cells) needed to grow and fruit if their conditions are right (wrong soil, too little humidity, etc.)
            For this reason, most mushroom foragers look for particular types of trees and plants in old growth woods when hunting for mushrooms and are always out after a good rain. Some like pines or coniferous areas (Larch Boletus), others like oaks (Hen of the Woods), elms (morels) or deciduous areas. Some are growing on trees and others will be close to the ground. One thing is for certain – you will have to look carefully.
            And this is where we get to the actual mechanics of mushrooming. Like the earlier posts on our “you can eat that” series (click here), the same general rules of foraging apply; but with mushrooms, I would add a couple of other precautions. First, lots of mushrooms are severely toxic, causing mild stomach discomfort at best and death, at worst. If you are not absolutely sure about what you have, then DO NOT EAT IT. It’s not worth your life to eat a false chanterelle and go to the hospital. Second, bring at least 2 different mushroom guides with you, that way you can cross-reference any questionable mushroom. Also, if you have a smart phone, having Internet access is fantastic. You can easily look up several online sources for mushroom identification on the spot.[4] And third, if you can, find an expert forager to go with you the first time around. Most foragers are happy to do so, but mushroomers are a bit secretive – lest their favored foraging spot goes public. But honestly, unless you are looking for truffles (which humans can’t do anyway – dogs and pigs do all the work), it’s doubtful you will find the motherload of mushroom booty. You will probably find a few to start and get better at spotting with time.
            Decay is a good thing. Really. It’s all part of the cycle of life – and in the case of mushrooms, a pretty tasty one at that.

This post is dedicated to Dryden Wode Hull. May you rest in peace.

Pasta with Fresh Chanterelles

Right now, it’s the season for chanterelles or Cantharellus cibarius. Where I am in Europe, they are often found in deciduous forests that are heavy with beech trees. You can usually find them at the base roots or the vicinity of the tree (they are symbionts). They will have a warm yellow appearance and no true gills. If you open one up, the interior should be white. There are two mushrooms that might be confused with a true chanterelle. “False chanterelle” or Hygrophoropsis aurantiaca will have a more orange color and true gills attached to the stem. While not completely poisonous, it’s not particularly tasty and will cause some mild stomach upset if ingested. The Omphalotus (Jack o’-lantern mushrooms) also resemble chanterelles, but if you open one up, the flesh will be orange-yellow, not white, like a true chanterelle.
Chanterelles are best left on their own, sautéed simply with some olive oil or butter. Their peppery flavor (they are called Pfifferlings in German!)  and high glutamate (the same stuff that makes miso so yummy) content make them a natural flavor booster. They make a great accompaniment to most anything: soups, pastas, sauces, meats, etc. Here’s my version with cream and pasta.

16 oz. package of tagliatelle or other wide-banded pasta
3 tbs. olive oil
2 shallots, finely chopped
1 clove of garlic, minced or crushed
1 pd. of chanterelles, cleaned or brushed for dirt (and critters!), large ones cut in half
1/4 c. dry white wine
1 c. heavy cream
2 tbs. of fresh thyme, chopped
salt and pepper to taste

1.     Heat a medium non-stick pan with olive oil over medium high heat. When the oil shimmers, but is not smoking, add shallots. Sauté over heat, until shallot soften, but are not browned. Add garlic and sauté for about 30 seconds.
2.     Add mushrooms, and sauté with shallots and garlic. When the mushrooms start releasing their liquid (about 3-4 minutes), add white wine to the pan. Continue sautéing over medium heat until almost all the liquid has reduced. Add cream to mushrooms and heat gently to thicken. Season with salt and pepper.
3.     Meanwhile, prepare pasta according to package directions. Drain and toss with mushroom mixture. Serve with thyme scattered on top.
NB: This recipe can easily be made vegan by replacing the cream for soy cream.


[1] For some of you, especially those interested in biology, this stuff is old hat. But for those that haven’t taken biology since high school, the world of living things is classified through a system started by Carl von Linné (otherwise known as Linnaeus) in 1735 with his groundbreaking book, Systema Naturae. Although the classification and taxonomic standards have gone through several major changes (from species on up), the structure remains basically the same since the 18th century.
[2] Once again, science geeks can skip this part. All living creatures have genetic material embedded in them, but not all have a membrane surrounding their cell nucleus. Eukaryotes have a membrane surrounding their cell nucleus, while prokaryotes, such as bacteria, do not. (The name eukaryote comes from the Greek, ευ , meaning good/true, and κάρυον meaning nut, refering to the nucleus. Prokaryote is πρό, meaning before, and the same ending κάρυον for nucleus.)
[3] In chemistry, the distinction between organic and non-organic chemistry has to do with the element carbon – the element that is basis for all life forms. (There are specifics regarding the types of carbon bonds, such as C-H or double or triple bonds. For our purposes, this is not important. ). Although diamonds and coal are also carbon-based substances, for historical reasons (alchemy has a large part to do with this), they have always been considered inorganic.
Enhanced by Zemanta