Pages

Showing posts with label USDA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label USDA. Show all posts

Monday, April 8, 2013

Hunger Strike



Potatoes.  My dad hated potatoes.

Growing up in a Korean household, you eat a lot of varied things – a lot of things that most people would not consider “food” (Sea cucumbers? Congealed cow’s blood? Bellflower root? Yep, we ate them all.), but the one food item that never made an appearance? Potatoes.

It’s not that potatoes are not featured in Korean cuisine – there are plenty of recipes with them. It’s just that my dad hated them…to the point where he forbade my mom from ever buying them (Unless my brother-in-law was coming into the house. He was supposed to have potatoes. He’s Irish.) There was another reason: Hunger.

My dad was born on the island of Cheju in what is now South Korea.[1]  At the time of his birth, the island was occupied by Imperial Japan, during World War II.[2]  By the time my Dad was two years old, my paternal grandmother was working in Japan and my paternal grandfather, a radically independent fisherman with Communist leanings, had left to join the Kim Il-Sung’s Workers’ Party of North Korea. My grandfather was never to be seen again.
                     
What did this mean for my father? It meant potatoes. Endless amount of potatoes. Rice was too expensive. Potatoes were cheap. And they were ubiquitous. For those living in the relative comfort of Seoul, food was to be found through the black markets of US Army provisions[3]. But for my father, growing up on an island that was believed to be a hotbed for Communist partisans, this meant NO food. Already on the threshold of severe famine, the burn-and-slash attacks by Nationalist guerilla groups had drained the island’s resources dry. Even fishing, which had sustained the island for years, was destroyed as American and anti-Communist Nationalist navies patrolled local waters.

While war is an obvious condition for food insecurity, what we have now in the United States seems unfathomable.  According to the latest statistics from the USDA[4], 15% of Americans, or about one in seven, are using the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (“SNAP”), better known as food stamps. Despite the “recovery” from the Great Recession of 2008, food stamp usage has remained relatively high, even rising 1.8% from January of 2012.

Food banks and pantries across the US are suffering in what seems to be the perfect storm for hunger: Smaller food donations and rising ranks of needy persons. Furthermore, tight demand for food has only made this condition worse. Under the Emergency Food Assistance Program, USDA buys excess food from suppliers and donates it to local food banks. In the past year, tight supplies, due to drought and skyrocketing worldwide demand, has decreased the amount of food USDA has bought for the program and thus the amount donated to food charities.[5] On the other hand, food banks have seen the demand for their services grow, in some places by double digits, as economic recovery has not meant new jobs for many. While the newest numbers by the US Department of Labor indicate a drop in unemployment from the recent all time high of 10% in October, 2009 to 7.6%,[6] as several economists have noted, the numbers don’t reflect the real story: many unemployed have been so discouraged by the job market, they have dropped out all together, only increasing the pressure on welfare benefits such as SNAP and Social Security.

But what the numbers can’t reflect are the poignancies of hunger. While the physical effects are obvious -- malnutrition, arrested mental and physical development for children, and higher rates of disease -- the psychological effects can and do last just as long. For every person on food stamps, using the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (“WIC”) or receiving a subsidized lunch at school, there is a story of pain, humiliation and mental anguish unassuaged even when or if they ever come off the welfare rolls. As seen in Ancel Keys’ famous study on the psychological effects of hunger[7], Keys noted that subjects were prone to disordered eating habits, vacillating between devouring their food or eating so slowly as to savor every last bit of food. While Holocaust victims exemplified the conclusions of Keys’ study, his observations are no less applicable to those living in food insecure homes now. Behaviors such as hoarding, gorging or hiding food last far longer than the physical pangs of hunger. And for many, the constant insecurity of not having enough food will mark their own sense of security for years to come.

And for my father, that insecurity came in the form of a lowly potato. It was not a vegetable destined to be a chip or a fry, but a lingering symbol of poverty and hunger. It was a constant reminder of a childhood that he would rather forget. For many of America’s children, parents and so many others, they could only wish hunger was such a distant memory. Unfortunately for them, it’s an ever-present reality that will only bring more scars than they can ever hope to bear now or in the future. With or without potatoes.

This post is part of Food Bloggers Against Hunger, a collaborative effort of over 200 food bloggers, The Giving Table, Share Our Strength and the documentary, A Place at the Table to bring awareness about hunger, protect SNAP dollars for hungry families and push for anti-hunger legislation in Congress. Want to do something to fight hunger? Click here to write to your Representative, Senator or elected official that you want to end hunger in America by maintaining and prioritizing anti-hunger initiatives in Congress.

This post has been cross-posted at the Huffington Post.


[1] Cheju Island, now a giant tourist destination for much of East Asia, was a small underdeveloped island, mainly populated by fishermen/women and small farmers in the early 20th century.
[2] Korea was annexed in 1910 by Imperial Japan. Much like the colonial empires of 19th and 20th century Europe, Japan sought to dominate the Korean peninsula for strategic purposes.
[3] My mother’s first introduction to cheese and mayonnaise was from the black markets in Seoul during the Korean War. As US troops filled the city, American foodstuffs, such as chewing gum, chocolate and yes, American cheese, were introduced for the first time in Korea.
[5] In 2011, the USDA bought 421million pounds of surplus food; in 2012, only 129. (Source, USDA).
[7] The study, dubbed the Minnesota Starvation Experiment, was done in 1944-1945, not only to study the psychological aspects of hunger and starvation, but also to help direct Allied relief efforst in post-World War II Europe. The results of the experiment were summarized in 1950 in Keys’ two-volume work, The Biology of Human Starvation. Keys, A.; Brožek, J.; Henschel, A.; Mickelsen, O.; Taylor, H. L. (1950). The Biology of Human Starvation (2 volumes). St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Press, MINNE edition.

Thursday, March 15, 2012

You Can't Do That On Television



Unless you’ve been living under a rock or don’t have kids, you’ve probably heard about the “pink slime.” If not, “pink slime,” dubbed by former United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) scientists and whistleblowers Carl S. Custer and Gerald Zirnstein[1], is the scrapings of beef scraps, connective tissue and other fatty beef trimmings off the slaughterhouse floor (read: stuff that no one else will eat), ground to a gelatinous pulp, centrifuged to remove excess fat, and then treated with a “puff of ammonium hydroxide” to kill food pathogens, such as E. coli and salmonella.[2] According to Zirnstein, 70 percent of supermarket ground beef is BLBT.[3] But why can’t we see it? Because it’s often mixed in with “real” beef as filler and there are NO USDA regulations for labeling it as anything other than “100% beef.”
School kids get the delightful mixture of BLBT as well. In 2009, the USDA school lunch program bought 5.5 million pounds of the stuff. This year, the USDA was slated to buy 7 million pounds for school kitchens across the country.
            Beef Products, Inc. (BPI),[4] the sole manufacturer of this tasty concoction, calls it “Boneless Lean Beef Trimmings,” (BLBT) and claims it’s perfectly safe to eat.
            Well, surprise, surprise, beyond absolutely disgusting, the “beef” is not safe. Even without testing, the method in BLBT is made could leave you with the heebie-jeebies. BLBT is made with trimmings that have the most contact with outermost parts of the cow – the same parts that are smeared with cow manure.[5] According to the New York Time’s article on BLBT, between 2005-2009, BLBT was four times more likely to contain salmonella. Cargill, the food behemoth with a checkered food safety history, stopped using BLBT because of salmonella contamination. Even McDonald’s, Taco Bell and Burger King stopped using the “beef” as filler for their products last year.[6]  In spite of this and other reported E. coli and salmonella outbreaks, USDA still deemed the stuff safe to eat.
But can you avoid it? Yes, if you grind your own meat or avoid beef all together. What about your kids? Pack them their own lunch.
But today, after 228,000 (and counting) people signed a Change.org petition to get BLBT out of school lunches and much bad publicity, the USDA announced that school districts would be able to opt out of buying BLBT meat for school lunches.[7]
 But this doesn’t solve the problem. The larger problem lies in something else: money.
The real losers in the pink slime fight are the poor. While everyone has zeroed in on the safety issue of pink slime (and rightfully so), the safety issues are really the byproduct of ruthless penny-pinching and corporate lobbying.  The only reason why BLBT even exists is because of the lobby efforts to promote it as “beef.”[8] The reason why the USDA contracted BPI for the meat in 2000, in spite of the misgivings of the Agricultural Marketing Service (the USDA division that buys food for school lunch programs), was so they could save about $.03 (!) per pound of meat…at a total saving of about $1 million dollars a year[9], versus buying regular trimmings.[10]
According to the USDA’s own numbers, 31.6 million children receive low cost or free lunches. Even though school districts might have a choice in buying no-filler beef, the likelihood that poorer school districts can afford the cost differential for better quality beef is little to none. These are the kids who have NO choice as to the quality of food they receive. And for some, school lunches may be the only meal they get all day. Has the school lunch system gotten so bad that the USDA is willing to sell out their health for 3 fucking pennies?!
And this is the crux of the problem. The quality of children’s nutrition and food is the most important factor in the School Lunch Program – not cost. What kind of lessons are we teaching our children when we say that food comes from a centrifuge and an ammonia aerator? And worst of all, is the USDA contributing to a society of have and have not’s in which the poor only receive the dregs of food only fit for dogs, under the excuse of the bottom line?
            While many of us can be grateful for increased awareness regarding our food system, we must remember that many do NOT have those resources. If there’s any lesson to be gleaned from this scandal is that money talks – and often talks over those who have none. Civil society is the first step in making sure moneyed interests don’t win over those of social justice. Get angry...and then do something.

NB: If you want to sign up for Change.org petition to get BLBT out of school lunches, please go here: https://www.change.org/petitions/tell-usda-to-stop-using-pink-slime-in-school-food

Ground Beef
For those of you who want to be sure what’s in your ground beef, there’s a really easy way to do this: grind your own.  While you can choose any cut you like for grinding, I think it’s helpful to think what you will be using the beef for before your grind. For example, for burgers I prefer chuck and a bit of sirloin for a meaty, but not too fatty burger. Others, namely Pat LaFrieda (the meat purveyor to Minetta Tavern and other top New York restaurants), use a combination of chuck, short rib and brisket. For other recipes, such as Bolognese, plain chuck is going to be fine, since it will be cooked down with other meats and tomato. But for grinding your meat, you can use an old-fashioned meat grinder (I have one and love it) or do it in a food processor. If you choose to do it in a food processor, there are a couple of things to keep in mind.
1.     Cut the meat into 1-inch cubes before your process. The processor can’t handle giant chunks of beef. Cutting it beforehand will make easier to process.
2.     Don’t put more than a pound of meat at a time. Your processor will get overworked and even worse, you will have unevenly chopped meat.
3.     Pulse, pulse, pulse. Process the meat in steps and there won’t be any temptation to over-process it into meat slime…kind of like the stuff above. This is especially important for burgers – over-processed meat will not pack nicely or cook properly.
If you are the type of person that doesn’t want to drag out the machines every single time you need ground beef, just do it all at once and freeze in portions. And yes, this method also works for pork, veal, and lamb. You’ll never go back to mystery meat again.


[1] This comes from Michael Moss’ Pulitzer Prize winning article in the New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/31/us/31meat.html?pagewanted=all
[2] Yes, this is the same ammonia, NH3, which is in bleach and other fine cleansing products.
[4] The euphemism “products” for what this company is selling is pretty laughable.
[5] Quick science note: E. coli is occurs naturally in digestive systems of warm-blooded animals, including humans. While most strains of E. coli are harmless (and are good for your digestive system), there are known strains that cause food poisoning, including E. Coli O157:H7, E. Coli O121:H19, etc. In the case of beef, E. Coli O157:H7 are often present in the intestinal tracts of beef cattle. The transference of E. Coli to beef is often a result of poor food processing, animal husbandry, and/or slaughtering practices. Granted, anything food is susceptible to E. coli poisoning, but due to its natural occurrence in cattle, beef is the most suspect in E. coli outbreaks.
            Salmonella is a different story. Although it too is naturally occurring, it is primarily pathogenic, and it also resides inside intestinal systems of mammals and birds. Once again, spread through fecal matter, good animal husbandry and slaughtering practices will often cut transmission rates from animal to food. But it’s not foolproof. Thus for both salmonella and E. coli, regular testing at all food contact sites (farm to processor to retail, etc.) is critical to catch cases before the spread. Also, proper food handling (keeping food refrigerated, washing hands, cooking food thoroughly) will also cut transmission rates.
[6] This, of course, begs the question of what the hell was fast food doing placing this crap in the burgers in the first place?
[8] In a 2002 email message, Gerald Zirnstein, the USDA whistleblower mentioned above, wrote: “I do not consider the stuff to be ground beef, and I consider allowing it in ground beef to be a form of fraudulent labeling.”
[9] One million dollars seems like a lot of money, but compared to, uh, military spending…like the C-17 fighter, which even Senator John McCain has admitted was useless, at a cost of $250,000,000 per plane, maybe we should be spending our money a little more wisely…
[10] Yes, once again, why are we using these trimmings to begin with?
Enhanced by Zemanta